The apple just is
Wow, that is incredible insight. Indeed people who are famous have wrote incredible works through what society calls illegitimate means. La Nausee is probably a "bad trip", however, most people don't want to think of that angle. That life is pointless is a dark way to look at life but there is comfort in that fact as well.First, thanks for recognizing my brilliance : ) Seriously, though, it is interesting. Both camps, the mystics and the existentialists, say pretty similar things, that dissolving buffers will present a direct encounter with existence. I've heard this explained (forget where) as the difficulty in describing "appleness". You can never really convey the is-ness of an apple because in doing so you automatically remove yourself from the direct experience of the apple. You can say the apple is red, or the apple is juicy, or the apple is sweet, but those are all signifiers. You fill the description with symbols meant to represent the apple, but of course that's not the apple itself. The symbols are at least one step back from the apple.
Mystics and existentialists alike figure that if you can get past these obstacles you encounter pure and true reality. After this agreement, they then part ways. The mystic walks away with a sense of nondual connectedness and meaning, and the existentialist walks away seeing no connections beyond those created outside of the pure awareness.
In Sarte's book the lack of connections was viewed with anxiety and -- hence the title -- nausea. I didn't realize before then that this negative view of existence was prompted by a bad drug trip -- something that by all accounts (never taken mescaline myself) gets the adrenaline flowing, causing anxiety. That's the exact experience portrayed in the novel, that when presented with pure existence, the protagonist felt anxious and partly horrified.
This is not to say existentialism is all bad, or negative by itself sans-Sarte. It is primarily concerned with finding individual meaning, not jettisoning meaning altogether. It's just a more depressing view than the mystics' who hold that everything is interconnected. Ahem, a mystic would look at all the interconnected events that led up to Sarte taking mescaline in 1935, and all the events thereafter, including the growth of existentialism itself, and the fine-lines between good experiences and bad ones, and call the complete story inspired. Then again, the existentialist would view those apparent connections as an inspired choice.
Basically, for a bad drug trip to have been one of the sparks of the movement is surprising because many report pleasurable mescaline trips. It could have gone either direction. In a way it makes you wonder if true existentialism isn't somehow betrayed by Sarte's book. Strictly speaking, "good" and "bad" are themselves signifiers removed from any direct experience. Adjectives are never direct. Peyote may be good or bad. The apple just is.
Labels: books, philosophy











